Ultimately, we work to improve patients lives but traditionally the voice of the patient was not important. However, over the last decades, many stakeholders have shifted to include the patient more in the decision-making process and patients voice their needs and preferences more.

Still capturing and evaluating patient preferences does not belong to the core capabilities of most biostatisticians.

This episode will help you to understand:
  • Why is it important for you to understand patient preferences?
  • What are the different ways, you can collect data on patient preferences?
  • What role do you as a statistician play in this area?
  • Where can we find more information about this topic?

Brett Hauber

Brett Hauber, PhD, is a Senior Economist and the Vice President of Health Preference Assessment at RTI HS. He is also an Affiliate Associate Professor in the School of Pharmacy at the University of Washington. He has more than 20 years of experience in health and environmental economics in academic, research, and government settings. His primary specialty is health preference assessment using discrete-choice experiments and other methods to quantify preferences for medical interventions and health outcomes.

He also has extensive experience in conducting benefit-risk analyses to support regulatory and HTA decisions. Dr. Hauber regularly teaches courses on health preference methods. He was a member of the Patient-Centered Benefit-Risk Steering Committee of the Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) and was the principal investigator in developing the Catalog of Methods for Assessing Patient Preferences for Benefits and Harms of Medical Technologies for MDIC.

Join The Effective Statistician LinkedIn group

I want to help the community of statisticians, data scientists, programmers and other quantitative scientists to be more influential, innovative, and effective. I believe that as a community we can help our research, our regulatory and payer systems, and ultimately physicians and patients take better decisions based on better evidence.

I work to achieve a future in which everyone can access the right evidence in the right format at the right time to make sound decisions.

When my kids are sick, I want to have good evidence to discuss with the physician about the different therapy choices.

When my mother is sick, I want her to understand the evidence and being able to understand it.

When I get sick, I want to find evidence that I can trust and that helps me to have meaningful discussions with my healthcare professionals.

I want to live in a world, where the media reports correctly about medical evidence and in which society distinguishes between fake evidence and real evidence.

Let’s work together to achieve this.