• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Enabling Statisticians to Lead through Innovation and Excellence

    Enabling Statisticians to Lead through Innovation and Excellence

Search The Effective Statistician

  • Winning with Words and Graphs: The Effective Statistician presentation and data visualization masterclass
  • How to be an effective statistician
  • Start here!
  • Podcast
    • PSI Careers
  • Free resources on visualization
    • Recording available: Flatten the curve – learnings from COVID-19 visualizations to better explore and communicate your data
  • Free resources on influencing
    • The Effective Statistician Leadership Program
    • Recording available: It’s not enough to be right!
  • Join The Effective Statistician LinkedIn group
  • Quick tips to be more effective
  • Legal disclosure – about us
    • Datenschutzerklärung – sorry, still in German…
You are here: Home / Innovation / Learn about different indirect comparison approaches and methods

Learn about different indirect comparison approaches and methods

By Reine Escalona on 2020-01-07 4

Learn about different indirect comparison approaches and methods
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share  
  • share 
  • save  

Only specialized statisticians discussed indirect comparisons in the past but over the years the topic developed into something, every statistician should know about.

In this episode, Benjamin and I talk about the important reasons for using indirect comparison (IC). We specifically address the following points:

  • Reasons for IC
    • H2H study design
    • HTA assessment
    • Regulatory discussions to inform the benefit-risk perspective
    • Guideline development
    • Clinical decision making
    • Bucher, 
  • The classical Bucher approach vs matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC)
  • How to incorporated meta-analyses
  • Different network-meta-analyses approaches (NMA): Bayes vs Frequentist
  • systematic literature reviews (SLR)
    • Data extraction sheet
    • The iterative process of analyses
  • Cochrane handbook
  • Tools
    • R
    • SAS
    • Cochrane tools
  • Visualizations
    • Funnel plot – publication bias
    • Forest plots – heterogeneity
    • Inconsistency assessments – only if H2H also available
  • Bias 
    • Different study designs
    • Different populations
    • Not exactly the same bridge comparator
    • Differing assessments
    • Different time points
    • Multiple time points
    • Pooling of doses
    • Different analyses methods
  • Precision vs bias
  • Pre-specified vs post-hoc
  • Secondary vs primary endpoints
  • Power of IC
  • Publish detailed analyses

    Further references:
    PRISMA http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/

    Earlier podcast episode:
    Network meta-analyses: why, what, and how

Listen to this episode and know more about Indirect Comparison now!

Never miss an episode of The Effective Statistician

Join hundreds of your peers and subscribe to get our latest updates by email!

Get the shownotes of our podcast episodes plus tips and tricks to increase your impact at work to boost your career!

Success! Now check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit
  • share 
  • tweet  
  • share  
  • share 
  • save  

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Markus says

    2020-03-04 at 8:26

    Hi Alex,

    regarding the rule of thumb of needing 4 times as large a sample size for an indirect comparison to obtain the same precision as a head-to-head comparison, you might have read that here (towards the end of section 2.1): https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0962280207080643

    Kind regards
    Markus

    Reply
    • Alexander says

      2020-03-16 at 9:02

      Thanks Markus!!

      Reply
  2. Vanessa says

    2020-05-02 at 20:20

    Hi Alexander,

    Great episode!

    The rule of thumb can be “felt” considering that the variance of the indirect comparison is the sum of the variance of each individual trial. For example:

    • Let’s consider 2 trials, trial 1: A vs Placebo and trial 2: B vs placebo with a variance V and N patients enrolled in each (to simplify let’s assume that the 2 trials have the same sample size and variance)
    • The variance of the indirect comparison is 2*V (Bucher formula)
    • To divide by 2 the variance of the indirect comparison, you need to multiply by 2 the sample size of each trial, so that the variance in each trial would become V/2
    • That’s why to compare A vs B indirectly, you need 2*N patients in both trials; i.e 4*N patients in total; compared to N patients that you would have needed if you had compared A vs B directly

    Kind regards,
    Vanessa

    Reply
    • Alexander says

      2020-05-02 at 21:26

      Awesome easy explanation!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Join the PSI newsletter here!

Categories

  • Excellence
  • Innovation
  • Knowledge
  • Leadership
  • PSI Calc Podcast

Recent Posts

  • Extrapolation to paedriatics
  • How to integrate external data into your clinical studies: from theory to application
  • A preview into the PSI conference
  • Patient-reported outcomes and the FDA Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidance
  • Apps on prescription paid by the government

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018

The podcast is run in association with PSI

Copyright © 2022 · Smart Passive Income Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in